Non-practicing entity US Ethernet Innovation’s (“USEI”) infringement action against Samsung was brought to a close last Friday, with E.D. Tex. Judge Michael H. Schneider granting the parties’ joint motion for dismissal with prejudice. USEI filed this action against Samsung and peripheral printing device manufacturer OKI Data Americas on June 22, 2012, alleging that certain OKI
Samsung
Judge Koh dismisses without prejudice Samsung’s standard essential patents and Apple’s related FRAND defenses (5:12-cv-630)
Judge Koh recently granted Apple and Samsung’s stipulated request to dismiss without prejudice Samsung’s claims that Apple infringes certain declared-standard essential patents (SEPs) and Apple’s related FRAND defenses and counterclaims. There is no indication in the filing that the parties are negotiating a settlement as to those SEPs, though that’s always a possibility. The stipulation…
U.S. Dept. of Justice closes investigation of Samsung’s assertion of standard essential patents
On Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced that it was closing its investigation into Samsung’s use of standard essential patents, which investigation had “focused on Samsung’s attempts to use its SEPs to obtain exclusion orders from the [ITC] relating to certain iPhone and iPad models.” DOJ stated that further investigation was no longer…
Apple Argues SEP Issues to Federal Circuit in Samsung ITC Appeal
Last week, Apple filed its brief as an intervenor in the Federal Circuit appeal involving Samsung’s stymied ITC case against Apple (Inv. No. 337-TA-794). Arguing the ITC’s finding of no violation should be affirmed with respect to the one patent-at-issue, Apple’s brief raised a number of SEP issues involving Samsung’s involvement with the IETF and…
Ericsson and Samsung settle SEP disputes with cross-license plus money
Ericsson announced a global cross-license settlement agreement with Samsung for patents relating to GSM, UMTS and LTE standards, which settlement includes two ITC investigations and litigation in E.D. Tex. that we have followed. Reports estimate that, in addition to exchange of consideration such as cross-licenses, Samsung will make an upfront payment to Ericsson of $650…
Realtek’s Comments in ITC’s review of RAND ruling in LSI-Realtek investigation (Inv. No. 337-TA-837)
We previously discussed the comments filed by complainant LSI in the International Trade Commission (ITC) investigation of whether Realtek and Funai infringe LSI’s alleged 802.11 and H.264 standard essential patents (SEPs). The ALJ’s initial determination found the SEP patents were not infringed but otherwise rejected RAND-based defenses. The Commission then decided to review the ALJ’s …
Patent Case Alert: Federal Circuit provides more guidance on injunctive relief involving multi-component devices in Apple v. Samsung
Today the Federal Circuit issued a decision that reversed and remanded the denial of Apple’s request to permanently enjoin Samsung mobile devices found to infringe Apple patents. This decision appears more flexible than the court’s prior rejection of a preliminary injunction in this case with respect to establishing a casual nexus between the alleged infringement…
Samsung tells ITC that in light of USTR veto, Ericsson should drop its standard-essential infringement claims (Inv. No. 337-TA-862)
A couple weeks ago, we noted that Ericsson had submitted a Notice of New Authority in its ITC case against Samsung (Inv. No. 337-TA-862) concerning the USTR’s recent disapproval of the exclusion order in ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-794. In this Notice of New Authority, Ericsson requested that presiding Administrative Law Judge David P. Shaw…
RANDomness
- InsideCounsel magazine recently published an article of ours, titled “Establishing Federal Rules of Patent Procedure“. This article is the first in a three-part series in which we examine certain “patent reforms” that have been proposed in response to the perceived rise in assertions by non-innovative patent assertion entities. In this article, we look
…
Ericsson asks ITC Administrative Law Judge David P. Shaw for an express FRAND determination in Samsung cellular/WiFi patent dispute (Inv. No. 337-TA-862)
Ericsson is a company that holds a significant number of standard-essential patents, and often seeks to monetize and enforce them. (They were just awarded infringement damages in Texas, and they’re engaged in an SEP duel with Samsung in the ITC and in Texas). It wasn’t surprising, then, when Ericsson last week suggested a framework for…