Recently the House Judiciary Committee voted 24-8 to approve a revised version of the Innovation Act. As we previously discussed, the Innovation Act was re-introduced in the House earlier this year in the same form approved by the entire House at the end of 2013. The Judiciary Committee recently met to mark-up and
Federal judge permits MPHJ’s suit challenging Vermont’s bad faith patent demand letter law to proceed
We previously discussed the Vermont attorney general’s enforcement action against MPHJ Technology Investments, LLC, a non-practicing entity that has recently been the subject of regulatory scrutiny. The attorney general’s complaint, filed in Vermont state court in early May of 2013, alleges that MPHJ’s patent assertion conduct directed toward Vermonters violates the state’s Consumer Protection…
Senate Judiciary Committee approves PATENT Act
Yesterday, we reported on the manager’s amendments to the Protecting American Talent and Entrepreneurship Act, or “PATENT Act,” a bi-partisan patent reform bill introduced by Senator Leahy and several other Senators. After two additional amendments by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee during yesterday’s mark-up session, the committee approved the bill by a vote of …
Revised version of Senate patent reform bill released
On Tuesday, a proposed Manager’s Amendment was released for the Senate’s pending PATENT Act bill. Following is a recap of the recent wave of patent legislation proposals this year.
Innovation Act. Since 2013, the House and the Senate have considered various forms of patent reform legislation that attempt to address perceived patent litigation abuse. …
U.S. House of Representatives reintroduces same patent reform bill that passed the House last go around
Last week, House Judiciary Committee Chariman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) reintroduced the Innovation Act, a bill that attempts to address perceived patent litigation abuse. This current bill as introduced is identical to the bill that was passed by the House in December of 2013 by a vote of 325-91. Discussed below are some of the…
Court construes patent to incorporate IEEE standard’s definition of disputed term
The Western District of Texas recently held that patent holder Innovative Wireless Solutions (IWS) acted as its own lexicographer by expressly referencing the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.3 Ethernet standard’s definition of a disputed claim term in the patents-in-suit. Therefore, the disputed claim was construed to incorporate the standard’s definition.
Background. Cisco…
Senator Leahy pulls patent litigation reform bill
As we previously reported, the Senate Judiciary Committee has postponed a vote on proposed patent litigation reform legislation several times. Now, the Senate is tabling the issue altogether due to an apparent lack of bi-partisan support for the provisions in the bill. On Wednesday, Senator Leahy, the bill’s sponsor, announced that “there has…
FTC revises and seeks comment on proposed “Patent Assertion Entity” study
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) recently published a Federal Register notice seeking additional public comments on the FTC’s proposed collection of information about Patent Assertion Entities (“PAEs”) (see our Sep. 27, 2013 post about the FTC’s first notice about the PAE study). Public comments are due by June 18, 2014.
Generally. In this notice,…
Patent Case Alert: Supreme Court adopts more flexible, deferential test for attorney fee shifting in patent cases (Octane Fitness and Highmark)
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court issued two opinions (Octane Fitness and Highmark) that create a more flexible, deferential standard for determining what constitutes an “exceptional” patent case in which a district court has discretion to award reasonable attorney’s fees to the prevailing party. The Court rejected the Federal Circuit’s rigid test that required…
Back to state court: Vermont’s unfair competition suit premised solely on state law
After being removed to federal district court last May, the Vermont Attorney General’s suit against non-practicing entity MPHJ is being sent back to state court. The decision holds that the AG’s unfair competition claims arising from MPHJ’s patent enforcement efforts belong in state court and raises the question of whether other patent demand letter jurisprudence …